Burma Digest publication

Challenges ahead on Burma’s Road to ICC

Universal Jurisdiction versus National Sovereignty & other issues

Book back-cover Book front-cover

Recently, human rights activists inside and outside of Burma are calling the International Criminal Court to investigate human right crimes being committed, and have been committed, by Burma’s brutal rulers on the long suffering people of Burma.

But, as Burma is not a signatory of Rome statute of ICC, Burma’s dictators may just ignore any indictment by the ICC. To make matters worse, the ICC itself is neither perfect nor powerful. It has its own problems_ the ICC has been criticised by many statesmen and academics on quite a number of issues. And big democracies like the USA and India are refusing to sign the Rome Statute of ICC, making it look like a lame-duck.

This book tries to be of use in human rights activists’ quest to take Burma’s case to the International Criminal Court by looking at the debates and controversies surrounding the ICC from a positive point of view and arguing that the ICC is a welcoming development for the Rule of Law in the whole world including Burma.

This book is written in a way to give basic knowledge about the ICC to an ordinary casual reader while at the same time raising some important debate starting points for more serious readers, learners and activists.

All proceeds from the sale of this book will go to non-governmental healthcare charities inside Burma.

Buy this book on Amazon NOW! http://www.amazon.com/Challenges-ahead-Burmas-Road-ICC/

- reported by Thandar Htike

Pro-democracy activists in London, led by the exile-UK branch of Burma’s National league for Democracy, made FBE preparation meeting at Sasana Ramsi Buddhist Monastery in Colindale, London on 15.05.2009 17:30pm.

The Forum of Burmese in Europe FBE (13th conference) will be held in London on 20.06.09 & 21.06.09; which will also be attended by delegates from Asia as observers, as well as NLD-LA HQ leaders and a Minister of the exile Burmese government.

102_1340.JPG102_1342.JPG102_1345.JPG102_1339.JPG

- reported by Thandar Htike

Pro-democracy activists in London, led by the exile-UK branch of Burma’s National league for Democracy, staged demonstrations in front of the British Foreign Office in London on 15.05.2009 calling for more UK pressure on Burma military regime to release people’s leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi from prison.

102_1332.JPG102_1330.JPG102_1326.JPG102_1329.JPG102_1336.JPG102_1335.JPG

- reported by Thandar Htike

Pro-democracy activists in London, led by the exile-UK branch of Burma’s National league for Democracy, staged demonstrations in front of the Burmese military regime Embassy on 15.05.2009 denouncing regime’s recent illegal lowly ploys to extend Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s detention upto five more years.

102_1319.JPGdemonstration-burma-3.jpg102_1320.JPG102_1315.JPGdemonstration-burma-4.jpgdemonstration-burma-2.jpgdemonstration-burma-1.jpg102_1323.JPG102_1321.JPG

- reported by Thandar Htike

Pro-democracy activists in London, led by the exile-UK branch of Burma’s National league for Democracy, staged demonstrations in front of the United states Embassy on 14.05.2009 calling for more US pressure on the military regime to release people’s leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi from prison.

102_1307.JPGdemonstration-in-front-of-us-embassy.jpgin-front-of-us-embassy.jpg

By Aung Hla Tun

YANGON (Reuters) – Myanmar opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi was charged on Thursday with breaking the terms of her house arrest and faces up to five years in jail after an American intruder sneaked into her lakeside home, her party said.

Opposition activists denounced her trial, set to begin on Monday, as a ploy by the country’s junta to keep Suu Kyi, 63, sidelined ahead of elections in 2010.

Her National League for Democracy (NLD), which won a landslide election victory in 1990 only to be denied power by the military, “strongly condemned” the new charges two weeks before her latest six-year detention is due to expire on May 27.

The Nobel Peace laureate has spent 13 of the past 19 years in detention, most of it held virtually incommunicado at her home, with her telephone line cut, her mail intercepted and visitors restricted.

She was charged under the Law Safeguarding the State from the Dangers of the Subversive Elements, which imposes a three-to-five-year jail term if a detainee “violates the restrictions imposed on them.”

The charges stem from a bizarre incident involving U.S. citizen John William Yettaw, who, according to state media, claimed to have swum across Inya Lake and spent two days in Suu Kyi’s compound earlier this month.

Yettaw was charged with abetting, or “encouraging a violation of the law,” said Aung Thein, one of Suu Kyi’s lawyers.

Other reports said he had been charged with entering a restricted zone and breaking immigration laws, but Aung Thein could not confirm those charges.

Yettaw was arrested on May 6 as he swam back from Suu Kyi’s home. U.S. embassy officials were allowed to see him on Wednesday but he revealed little about his motives.

“We cannot comment. He didn’t tell us any details,” embassy spokesman Richard Mei said.

It was apparently the second time that Yettaw — described by state media as a 53-year-old psychology student and a resident of Missouri — had tried to meet Suu Kyi at her home.

Suu Kyi’s main lawyer, Kyi Win, said Yettaw was told to leave after his first attempt in late 2008. This time Yettaw refused.

“He said he was so tired and wanted to rest, but she pleaded with him. Then he slept overnight on the ground floor,” Kyi Win told the Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB).

“GRAVE AND CONCERNING”

Suu Kyi’s detention in a house inside the prison will renew fears for her health after she was put on an intravenous drip last week for dehydration and low blood pressure.

Her main doctor, Tin Myo Win, was detained last week and is still being held at an undisclosed location.

The United Nations has said Suu Kyi’s continued house arrest is illegal under Myanmar law, which permits detention for five consecutive years before the accused must be freed or face trial.

Suu Kyi lodged an appeal against her detention after it was extended last year in an apparent violation of the law. The junta denied the appeal, saying they could hold her for a sixth year.

“The regime filed these charges to extend her detention beyond the six years,” said Aung Din, executive director of the U.S. Campaign for Burma, a pro-democracy group.

“It is an act of blackmailing the international community, especially the United States, demanding a ransom to get back an American citizen and better treatment for Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.”

Australia’s Foreign Minister Stephen Smith called the arrest “grave and concerning” and demanded her immediate release.

The 10-nation Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), one of the few groups that allows Myanmar as a member, is “concerned” by the latest events there, Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva told Reuters.

“We would like to see positive steps being taken according to the roadmap. It’s very important the political process is inclusive,” he said.

The generals have in the past ignored calls for her release as they push ahead with a seven-step “roadmap to democracy” expected to culminate in the multi-party elections in 2010.

The NLD and Western governments dismiss the “roadmap” and last year’s army-drafted constitution as a cover for the generals to cement their grip on power.

By Daoud Kuttab

daoud_kuttab.png

Daoud Kuttab, an award-winning Palestinian journalist, is Professor of Journalism at Princeton University.

Ramallah – As the summit between US President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu approaches, most of the discussion has focused on whether or not the newly elected Israeli leader will finally say that he backs a two-state solution. This is the wrong approach. Israelis should not determine the status of the Palestinian entity, nor should Palestinians have a say in what Israelis call their own state.

The only question that Obama should ask Netanyahu is, When will Israel quit the occupied Palestinian territories? Attempts at obfuscation – whether by talking about an “economic peace,” or insisting that Arabs recognize the Jewishness of the state of Israel – should not be allowed to derail the goal of ending the inadmissible occupation.

During Obama’s first meeting with a Middle East leader, a simple and courageous Arab plan was outlined. Empowered by Arab leaders, Jordan’s King Abdullah II officially presented the peace plan devised by the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic States. Despite the Israeli wars on Lebanon and Gaza, Arabs offered  normal relations with Israel once it quits the lands that it occupied in 1967. (more…)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.